tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1780806945960886534.post6209879262219740563..comments2024-03-28T05:47:54.177+00:00Comments on Philosophical Disquisitions: What is Constructivism in Metaethics? (Part 2)John Danaherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06761686258507859309noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1780806945960886534.post-46683799079814710462020-11-19T22:21:30.928+00:002020-11-19T22:21:30.928+00:00But then I'm not sure where simple subjectivis...But then I'm not sure where simple subjectivism would fit into the "nihilist, constructivism, realist" framework.seanrsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05429965562002657504noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1780806945960886534.post-78554905020931506582020-11-19T22:20:49.369+00:002020-11-19T22:20:49.369+00:00After reading more posts in the series, it appears...After reading more posts in the series, it appears that the answer is "No." This is because even if I say X is right*, it's still possible for my judgment to not withhold scrutiny from the practical point of view, considering all of my normative judgments.seanrsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05429965562002657504noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1780806945960886534.post-68675041684978296742020-11-19T21:52:42.049+00:002020-11-19T21:52:42.049+00:00Super helpful posts John, thanks a lot.
Under thi...Super helpful posts John, thanks a lot.<br /><br />Under this taxonomy, would simple subjectivism (X is right if I say X is ring) count as a kind of constructivism?seanrsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05429965562002657504noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1780806945960886534.post-50834168927851668912011-04-27T00:06:30.695+01:002011-04-27T00:06:30.695+01:00Glad you find them useful Joy.Glad you find them useful Joy.John Danaherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06761686258507859309noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1780806945960886534.post-2898459247676393552011-04-26T23:02:47.934+01:002011-04-26T23:02:47.934+01:00i'm currently taking a metaethics course and d...i'm currently taking a metaethics course and discovered your blog through a quick google search on street. What a help these posts have been, thank you!Joyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18395224777457343401noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1780806945960886534.post-81409345545255118572010-06-01T08:23:41.513+01:002010-06-01T08:23:41.513+01:00Quick answer... NOTHING. Meta in philosophy genera...Quick answer... NOTHING. Meta in philosophy generally points to completely useless speculative BS. As in metaphysics. When you see "meta" in a philosophy topic... get ready for complete understated BS.<br /><br />Cheers!<br /><a href="http://RichGriese.NET" rel="nofollow">RichGriese.NET</a>Rich Griesehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16947798364523082547noreply@blogger.com