tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1780806945960886534.post981959753406769301..comments2024-03-28T05:47:54.177+00:00Comments on Philosophical Disquisitions: Who's Still Afraid of Determinism? (Part 3)John Danaherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06761686258507859309noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1780806945960886534.post-8561476786367481802011-01-06T22:56:29.836+00:002011-01-06T22:56:29.836+00:00Hi robert,
Thanks for pointing that out to me. I...Hi robert, <br /><br />Thanks for pointing that out to me. I changed the symbol from λ to ψ in order to clear up the confusion. I don't know about the "lambda dot a"-thing you referred to. It doesn't appear anywhere in the version that comes up on my screen. Perhaps there is some issue with the way in which your browser represents the html code I was using? My guess is that it should be a conjunction.John Danaherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06761686258507859309noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1780806945960886534.post-87247391579699214922011-01-05T16:13:52.298+00:002011-01-05T16:13:52.298+00:00John, your explanation is clouded somewhat by your...John, your explanation is clouded somewhat by your notation. In the box, lambda is the laws of physics, while in the text, it is an action of A. And is the dot in (lambda dot a) the same as the conjunction ^? Also, some typographic error gives &lambda instead of the actual symbol.Robert Oerterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09708981993708509662noreply@blogger.com