tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1780806945960886534.post1403029640447810784..comments2024-03-28T05:47:54.177+00:00Comments on Philosophical Disquisitions: Taking the Relational Turn: How should we think about the moral status of animals, robots and Others?John Danaherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06761686258507859309noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1780806945960886534.post-30800643578904611772021-10-18T08:32:42.590+01:002021-10-18T08:32:42.590+01:00Interesting comment on the relational turn. Thinki...Interesting comment on the relational turn. Thinking relations is difficult, indeed. <br />For my review see <br />http://rieksopdenakker.nl/index.php/2020/04/22/het-koesdoekje-van-mark/<br />(in Dutch)Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16754069069219038819noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1780806945960886534.post-38926547017830928652021-01-13T23:47:12.352+00:002021-01-13T23:47:12.352+00:00Great post John. I had the same worries with the r...Great post John. I had the same worries with the relational approach: it seems to commit even more of the anthropocentrism and traditionalism that Gunkel/Coeckelbergh criticize the properties approach for. Do you know if any of Singer/Regan/Korsgaard have replied to these objections?seanrsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05429965562002657504noreply@blogger.com