tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1780806945960886534.post7208437240529525266..comments2024-03-28T05:47:54.177+00:00Comments on Philosophical Disquisitions: Are we morally obliged to eat some meat? (Part Two)John Danaherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06761686258507859309noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1780806945960886534.post-1524314508679606732020-05-29T06:56:42.948+01:002020-05-29T06:56:42.948+01:00Correction:
given the vegetarian equivalency in ...Correction: <br /><br />given the vegetarian equivalency in moral status between man and animal, and the moral equivalence between consuming an accidentally killed animal and consuming an animal dead from natural causes, then the conclusion should have been: <br />eating roadkill (including humans freshly killed in car accidents), animals (including humans) freshly killed by other accidents (by land cultivation or some other way), animals (including humans) freshly dead from natural causes is morally obligatory.Markhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02168959025197032580noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1780806945960886534.post-61272391728342113412020-05-29T01:32:51.817+01:002020-05-29T01:32:51.817+01:00The conclusion should have been:
eating roadkill a...The conclusion should have been:<br />eating roadkill and any animal killed by accident (by land cultivation or some other way) is obligatory.<br /><br />The perverse incentive objection can be equally used against strict vegetarianism: by giving a justification or excuse to eat animal products, strict vegetarianism arguments provide people with more of an incentive to to take less care in avoiding the harmful ways of exploiting animals to produce these products.Markhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02168959025197032580noreply@blogger.com